This site is not maintained anymore. Please move to MHWiki.org

Difference between revisions of "Talk:Battery Launcher Mk. II (loaded)"

From Die2Nite Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 78: Line 78:
 
|-
 
|-
 
| | 2 || --[[User:Isaaclw|Isaaclw]] 16:24, 14 July 2011 (PDT) (note: 1 of 8 that killed a total of 16. exact spread unknown)
 
| | 2 || --[[User:Isaaclw|Isaaclw]] 16:24, 14 July 2011 (PDT) (note: 1 of 8 that killed a total of 16. exact spread unknown)
 +
|-
 +
| | 1 || --[[User:Isaaclw|Isaaclw]] 15:22, 15 July 2011 (PDT)
 +
|-
 +
| | 2 || --[[User:Isaaclw|Isaaclw]] 15:22, 15 July 2011 (PDT)
 
|-
 
|-
 
| | x  
 
| | x  

Revision as of 22:22, 15 July 2011

Weapon Results

As the Battery Launcher Mk. II is guaranteed to kill 1 zombies per use we need to record how many kills before the battery was depleted.

Kills per battery Recorded by (signature/town)
2 Odeon 22:16, 17 April 2011 (PDT) The screaming waterfall. Thanks goes to LuckyLuckLuc for keeping the thread in our town up-to-date with usage stats.
8
8
13
7
1
8
10
1
1
2
3
1
4
4
8
3
2
9
2
5
5
1 "Bribed Dregs" beginning. --Kabb 15:31, 19 June 2011 (PDT)
3
6
1
1
4 "Bribed Dregs" End. --Kabb 15:31, 19 June 2011 (PDT)
2 --Isaaclw 16:24, 14 July 2011 (PDT) (note: 1 of 8 that killed a total of 16. exact spread unknown)
2 --Isaaclw 16:24, 14 July 2011 (PDT) (note: 1 of 8 that killed a total of 16. exact spread unknown)
2 --Isaaclw 16:24, 14 July 2011 (PDT) (note: 1 of 8 that killed a total of 16. exact spread unknown)
2 --Isaaclw 16:24, 14 July 2011 (PDT) (note: 1 of 8 that killed a total of 16. exact spread unknown)
2 --Isaaclw 16:24, 14 July 2011 (PDT) (note: 1 of 8 that killed a total of 16. exact spread unknown)
2 --Isaaclw 16:24, 14 July 2011 (PDT) (note: 1 of 8 that killed a total of 16. exact spread unknown)
2 --Isaaclw 16:24, 14 July 2011 (PDT) (note: 1 of 8 that killed a total of 16. exact spread unknown)
2 --Isaaclw 16:24, 14 July 2011 (PDT) (note: 1 of 8 that killed a total of 16. exact spread unknown)
1 --Isaaclw 15:22, 15 July 2011 (PDT)
2 --Isaaclw 15:22, 15 July 2011 (PDT)
x

There are much cleaner ways to set up a table for data. Anyway, what you've collected so far shows a 20% chance of the battery being consumed. We could use a bit more data, though. --TechSmurf 22:31, 17 April 2011 (PDT)

Feel free to update the table to make it easier to collect the data if you feel like it. -- Odeon 22:37, 17 April 2011 (PDT)